Cover Story


Healthy returns



How Michael Blackwood seized an opportunity to grow Gateway Health Plan’s revenue by 25 percent in two years

By Brian Horn


Smart Business Pittsburgh | March 2008


Opportunity pounded on Michael Blackwood’s door back in early 2005. The only problem was he couldn’t answer it by himself

On his doorstep was an opportunity to grow his company’s revenue and diversify its business through a new Medicare product. But, for Blackwood, the president and CEO of Gateway Health Plan L.P., the project wasn’t simply filling out some paperwork and then watching the money accumulate.

He needed the help of all his employees and his management team to get the product in place by January 2006.

The only way to do it was to get buy-in from all company employees on why they should go through the process to make the new product a reality.

“We had to create the sense of urgency and create the capacity simultaneously,” he says.

Here’s how Blackwood sold his staff on the initiative and held them accountable for results.

Communicate to get buy-in

Blackwood needed complete buy-in from the organization in order to take on such a monumental task in a short period.

He started by discussing the change with his senior management team, and then brought the rest of the managers into the discussion in early 2005.

He explained why the product was so attractive, filled them in on how much work it would take as well as the systems that the company had to create to make the change a success. He knew no other activity the company could undertake would lead to growing the company’s revenue line like the new Medicare product would.

“You had to make a case to the organization for why you needed to do this as an organization and do it so rapidly,” Blackwood says.

To get the point across, he showed them the projected $300 million revenue increase that the new product would provide.

“We also have a philosophy around here: You are either growing or you are dying,” Blackwood says. “So, they knew that this was going to create major growth for the company as very few things could have. Nothing motivates a company, in my opinion, more than growth. When they see growth is possible, and particularly of this magnitude, it’s sort of self-motivating.”

Blackwood also pointed out the number of members they would be able to retain, which has a lot to do with retaining positions and responsibilities in the $1.21 billion company.

“So, we made the business case for why we should do it and add this new line of business in a rapid period of time because it was in the direct interest of the company as well as in the direct interest of our employees and certainly in the direct interest of our owners,” Blackwood says. “So, it was not that hard of a case to make, frankly.”

After he made his case to all levels of management, Blackwood allowed the senior management team to be the communicators of the change because there was no way he could do it all himself.

“Make sure you communicate throughout the company the same things you communicate to your senior management team,” he says. “Sometimes you do it directly as a CEO; sometimes you rely on your senior staff to be ambassadors and proponents of the change so that they can help sell it through the company.”

He met with the team more frequently during the process in order to stay in the loop and to monitor the communication of the message.

“It took an intense amount of oversight,” Blackwood says. “Then, those people in the organization brought it to individual departments, the individual workers, through company meetings, through department meetings, even through sectional meetings, and made sure that we tested our efforts. ... Then we created a plan in each department to roll it out, which we sequentially followed. So it was a very complex undertaking.”

Blackwood says you should state the business case upfront in order to get the buy-in from the beginning.

“People will no longer just do it because someone tells them to do it,” Blackwood says. “I don’t believe that is the way things work in this marketplace anymore. You have to make the business case as to why it is critical, why it makes financial sense, why it makes business sense for the company, and that is half the battle right there.”

Though it was fairly easy to make the business case for the change, employees still had questions because they had other strategic efforts going on, and they were concerned about the allocation of resources. Employees also questioned whether the company could pull off the change successfully in the timeline suggested and if Blackwood would support budgetary changes to allow them to add new people or to modify the systems.

“We didn’t know this opportunity was going to exist until it was almost upon us,” he says. “Our managers and the global management team had to believe that we weren’t going to ask them to do it with the same number of people or with the same resources.

“As soon as they understood that we were going to put the money and resources and the systems behind them to build the capability — once they knew we were going to give them all the tools that they would need to have in order to do it — that created enormous buyin.”

Measure your progress

Blackwood compares implementing the new product to swallowing an elephant — you have to do it one small piece at a time. He says you need some type of management tool you can use to track the progress of all the efforts you are making to bring the product to the market, and what worked best for him was a Gantt chart.

Gantt charts are a type of bar chart used to measure a project’s progress, keep track of how an employee was doing and break down the work into components.

“It’s a way of visually seeing your progress of those elements of the total plan for which you are responsible — you being a department and you being an individual,” he says. “It’s a way of tracking progress toward completion of a very large project, which was the elephant I was talking about.”

You also need to break the set of tasks into components so everyone involved can take bite-size pieces of that elephant and digest it.

“We carve it up in a way that each person has a role, each person has a reference team as well as a Gantt chart and a business completion effort to get it done,” Blackwood says. “They can have milestones and deadlines and accomplishments, which they can convey electronically throughout the company using all types of communication tools like e-mail, fax and Gantt charts, and all of the tools at our disposal to get the word out to the people who need to know.”

Because just looking at the chart wasn’t enough proof the job was progressing, Blackwood met weekly with his management team for updates.

“The weekly meetings took those Gantt charts and gave me verbal reports,” Blackwood says. “We gave them to each other as well as to me personally. That gave us the confidence level that we were progressing at the rate that we needed to in order to have this product on line for the deadline, which was (Jan. 1, 2006). So, there was documentation. There was action being taken.”

As far as personnel goes, Blackwood says the people implementing the change need to be experts in the company who can execute the plan.

When it came down to assigning people to Gateway’s project, Blackwood turned to the best of the best in the organization.

“People who we knew were stars, people who we knew could do it, people who knew the company, knew the resources, knew how to make things happen in the company who could actually execute on this plan,” Blackwood says. “They were given the authority and the resources to do it, and they knew they could come to me at any point if they needed to ask for more resources or to modify the plan based on their requirements. They had complete access to me throughout the process, and I was very visible and very much a part of the planning itself.”

Although Blackwood knew the people working on the project could pull it off, he still needed to be kept in the loop. He tracked to make sure the execution of the plan was documented and could be expressed to him verbally during the weekly meetings.

“They were empowered and had the authority and the organization to make it happen,” he says. “So, I had high confidence they could, but I needed to hear — as well as the senior management team needed to hear — that the speed of progress was matching the deadlines that were approaching.”

Blackwood also referred to the Gantt chart to decide when he needed to get involved if something was heading in the wrong direction.

“That’s why we created a barriers section within that Gantt chart,” Blackwood says. “If I hear them run up against a barrier, I know I need to get involved. I have to define what that barrier is, or they do. Whenever I see a barrier, I know I have to personally get involved and help define the problem, and then perhaps engage other people to help knock those barriers down. I will not stop the process on things that are working. I tend to insert myself selectively on problems that emerge during the process.

“It could be based on reports that I get, feedback from individual people from members of my senior management team. I could bump into an employee, however, and they could give me a curbside consultation, which might be something from the ground level, which raises a question in my mind, and I may elevate it to a much higher status. So, I try to listen to all our employees. We try to combine the intelligence of all our employees and treat them as a major resource and give them a voice.”

After testing out the systems and fixing any glitches, the product went live in January 2006 and resulted in a 25 percent increase in revenue between 2005 and 2007.

“It has been, I would say, a resounding success because we have been able to make it work both programmatically and financially,” he says. “It has been a major diversification of the company in terms of product line and in terms of revenue stream, and it’s helped contribute to the financial performance of the company. It is a central part of our company.”

While the implementation wasn’t easy, not taking on the new product would have hurt the company’s potential.

“It would not have allowed us to diversify our revenue streams nearly as much as we were able to with this product,” Blackwood says. “And it created additional capabilities to serve our members. So, there was a programmatic addition as well as a financial positive for the company. So, I think we would have really missed an opportunity that may not come along again in my lifetime.”

HOW TO REACH: Gateway Health Plan L.P., (412) 255-4640 or www.gatewayhealthplan.com

More Health & Medical




Business as usual
How Jeff Margolis maintained normalcy as he took The TriZetto Group private


Proper perspective
How to create an environment that embraces growth


Selective service
How to build your leadership team with a discerning eye




Slowing it down
How David Bianconi put Progressive Medical in a better position by slowing down the path to advancement


The perfect prescription
How Gerald Proehl used communication and teamwork to keep employees at Santarus Inc. focused during a time of uncertainty


Building a future
How Cynthia Moore-Hardy united her team to complete a $155 million project at Lake Health


Connected to the community
How Berger Health System’s care reaches beyond hospitals


Healthy beginnings
There’s something attractive about ‘new’


Opening doors
How to make time for employees’ ideas and concerns


Surgical precision
How Crystal Haynes helped Saint Louis University Hospital find its niche to become a better organization


Balancing big and small
How to grow without alienating customers


See all articles in Health & Medical


search



Copyright © 2010 Smart Business Network Inc.  •  Publishing, Sales, & Editorial Office  •  Smart Business Online
835 Sharon Drive,  •  Suite 200  •  Cleveland, OH 44145  •  P: 440-250-7000  •  F: 440-250-7001  •  E: webmaster@sbnonline.com

Website Development: Veridean Technology Solutions, LLC.