How business owners can benefit from contemporary forensic accounting

With increased regulatory demands and constant threats of fraud and misconduct, businesses have to watch their backs, especially when it comes to finances.

And in many cases, having a traditional accountant is not enough. Instead, you may need someone who has not only accounting skills, but investigative and analytical skills, as well.

In other words, you need a forensic accountant.

Forensic accounting enables business owners to get control over possible financial fraud and mismanagement and, more importantly, to deter it before it occurs. Forensic accountants can help save companies time, money and effort as they investigate fraud and misconduct, design effective antifraud controls, help mitigate the risks of future lawsuits, and deter fraud and misconduct.

“Forensic accounting engagements generally occur as a result of a legal action that requires investigation and analysis,” says James P. Martin, CMA, CIA, CFE, a managing director at Cendrowski Corporate Advisors LLC. “For example, forensic accounting techniques might be used to gather evidence and analyze data pertaining to a fraud. They might also be used to quantify economic damages in instances where value and/or profits might be lost, or in cases of business valuations to uncover unreported income or expenses.”

However, forensic accounting techniques can also be applied proactively to deter fraud.

Smart Business spoke with Martin about forensic accounting and how it can benefit a company, its owners and managers.

How does a forensic accounting engagement differ from an audit?

Forensic accounting engagements are different from audits on many levels. First and foremost, these engagements are nonrecurring and are only conducted at the request of a firm’s management. Audits, conversely, are recurring activities and are conducted on a periodic basis.

Forensic accounting engagements are targeted assessments of specific areas of a business; they are not general assessments of the business as a whole or its financial statements.

The methodology employed in an audit is also quite different from that used in forensic accounting engagements. Audits are conducted primarily by examining financial data, whereas forensic accounting analyses are conducted by examining a wide variety of documents and interviews.

Lastly, the goals of forensic accounting engagements are yet again very different from audits, where the goal of the latter is to detect the presence of material misstatements, irrespective of their cause. Audit activities are in no way designed to help an organization deter fraud, though they may detect such activity.

Because many frauds begin on a small scale, they may go undetected by auditors if the size of the fraud is below the auditor’s threshold for materiality. Moreover, even if the magnitude of a fraud is greater than the auditor’s threshold for materiality, a fraud may remain undetected by the auditor if it is well concealed.

However, forensic accounting engagements can be specifically tailored to deter fraud and potentially prevent it.