Business owners tend to put off succession planning if they don’t intend to exit in the near future. But circumstances can change quickly, and not having a plan in place could be a costly mistake.
“Every business, large or small, will reach a point where a decision needs to be made as to the next step regarding ownership,” says Corinne Baughman, a partner at Moss Adams LLP. “Whether the transition is one year or 10 years away, it needs to be part of the overall plan for any company.”
Smart Business spoke to Baughman about the process of succession planning and how it provides benefits before a transition occurs.
Do most businesses have succession plans?
The main problem with companies’ succession plans is that they don’t exist. Owners have plans to increase sales or add personnel, but they don’t have a strategic plan as it relates to a successor because it’s something they can kick down the road. It takes most companies years to implement a succession plan, and delaying limits options.
Every business should have a succession plan. You might think you’re going to pass the business on to management, sell to a strategic buyer or gift it to your children. That can change, but you need a plan in place to start addressing the issues that arise no matter which way you’re going to exit the business.
What is involved in succession planning?
The first step is to consider your long-term goals. Is it to grow larger, or expand the product or client base? Whether it’s a single owner or a private equity group, what are their business goals? Do they want to retain a certain amount of ownership, pass it on to family members or step away completely?
Once you’ve answered those questions and determined what everyone wants, it’s time to get into specifics and identify your way of getting to liquidity, whether it’s a sale, private equity backing, going public or whatever.
Then you need the right people in place to move the plan in that direction. That’s where many companies fail; one person calls the shots and succession drops to the bottom of his or her priority list. It’s important to spread the wealth of responsibility internally and develop the right support group of attorneys and CPAs. Everyone on the team needs to understand how to grow the value of the company — until you have good strategic financial and business plans, you’re not going to be ready for succession. You’re looking to get the most value out of a transition, but you should be doing that on a daily basis anyway and working on ways to increase the value of the business.
What are the most common mistakes companies make?
The biggest one is timing — the tendency is to put off succession, but fewer opportunities are available the closer you get to a transaction. You might be in the wrong legal structure or find out you should have had additional training for management personnel.
This becomes crucial when something unexpected occurs, such as a death or someone leaving the company. A key component of the succession plan may be gone, and without a strong team you may not have a backup plan.
Another mistake is that owners think a certain dollar amount is a home run that will set them up for life, and don’t plan for the net impact. It can be eye opening to owners when they realize what they end up with after taxes isn’t what they were expecting. You need to forecast future needs and assume whatever cash you receive on the day papers are signed will be the only cash you’ll receive. Many clients had deals with earn-out provisions and didn’t get another penny. Just as you do for your business, you need to create a financial model and budget for your personal needs.
Some people don’t like to think about succession and hang on too long, especially when they built the business themselves. But at some point you’re going to have to step down, and you should have a plan with goals and a time frame for that transition. ●
Insights Accounting is brought to you by Moss Adams LLP
Corporate governance has become a popular topic. While it primarily pertains to the governance of public companies, it can be a useful set of policies and procedures to help guide a private company by fostering discipline and informed decision-making.
“Historically, private company boards have been more casual in how they’re organized and how they act, but more recently private company boards and their stockholders are looking for more accountability,” says Christopher Ivey, shareholder and co-chair of the corporate and securities practice at Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth.
Smart Business spoke with Ivey about corporate governance for private companies and best practices for its implementation.
How does corporate governance operate in a private company setting?
The primary roles of a company’s board are supervising management, providing strategic direction and approving material actions. These roles are enabled through good corporate governance. A fully functioning, independent board that’s not controlled by the founder is more likely to exercise authority to make difficult decisions, including management changes. Beyond management changes, good corporate governance instills a level of discipline and accountability that the board may not otherwise be inclined to undertake. It also sends a good message to stockholders.
Should the board of a private company have legal or contractual obligations?
Corporate governance is not required in a private context with the exception of some regulated industries. Board members do, however, have fiduciary and legal obligations to stockholders to fulfill their duties of care and loyalty. Good corporate governance facilitates board members adhering to their fiduciary duties.
Corporate governance should be principle-based as opposed to operating by a rigid set of rules. However, codes of conduct and good committee charters can act as a guide.
Generally, what are some best practices for corporate governance?
Establish policies that help create an effective board of directors, such as director independence.
Form an audit committee of independent board members to oversee audits — internal control systems, risk management, detecting and preventing fraud — and meet alone with auditors. Also, if practical, get audited financial statements, as banks and institutional investors may require them. But whether audits are required or not, having accurate financials leads to better-informed business decision-making.
Consider having a compensation committee of independent board members to recommend senior officer compensation and structure, and administer equity incentive plans. Officers on the board shouldn’t be making their own compensation decisions.
Additionally, you may want to have a corporate governance and nominations committee that can identify director candidates, evaluate board performance and establish a code of ethics/conduct. Similarly, other committees can be formed to handle special tasks as appropriate.
How insulated should the board be from the rest of the company?
It’s important to have transparency. At a minimum, transparency ensures clear disclosure of conflicts of interest so everyone understands each individual’s potential personal gain or interest in the matter being deliberated. Beyond that, clear communication among board members and management is important to make good, clear, strategic decisions with the best information available.
Should all private companies establish corporate governance policies?
Avoid having governance policies and committees solely for governance sake. Corporate governance should facilitate allowing the board and management to focus on running the business. You don’t want to consume all of your time just checking the corporate governance boxes.
Private companies should choose elements of corporate governance policies that work best for them. Don’t do it just because everyone else is doing it. Do it to the extent it’s appropriate for your context.
Christopher Ivey is a shareholder and co-chair of the corporate and securities practice at Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth. Reach him at (949) 725-4121 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Insights Legal Affairs is brought to you by Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth
Business succession is the one thing many companies fail to address for fear of relinquishing control, a lack of time, the feeling that successors aren’t ready or other reasons. But, it’s never too early to start succession planning.
“Statistically, roughly only 30 percent of family-owned businesses are effectively transferred to the second generation and just 10 percent make it to the third generation,” says Julianne Cruz, managing director of Advisory Services at CB&T Wealth Management. “There are myriad reasons for this, but one recurring issue is a lack of effective succession planning.”
Smart Business spoke with Cruz about how to effectively position your chosen successors for success.
How should business owners get started?
You need to consider the three ‘T’s of successful transition:
- Transferring management.
- Transferring ownership.
- Tax consequences.
In all cases, having a plan that is strategic and well executed is key, but that takes time. The most successful transition plans take place over a number of years, as successors develop the skill sets required to run the business.
How is management transferred?
It’s important to select an independent adviser who is highly experienced with planning issues to arrive at the best plan for you and the next generation.
Some areas to consider are: If more than one child is involved in the business, how will contentious decisions be made once you exit the business? If you want certain key, loyal employees to be cared for, as they are likely necessary for a smooth transition, what assurances do you have this will happen? What happens if unexpected health issues force the transition early? A well-developed plan ensures the business will thrive without interruptions, helps the next generation grow into their role at a reasonable pace and promotes future harmony among family members.
A short-term plan ensures there’s enough liquidity and insurance to hire necessary experts and avoid a fire sale. A mid-term plan must prepare developing successors or key employees to be in decision-making roles initially. It also would have a timeline for family members to step into their new roles with certain targets. The long-term plan is ultimately what you want to happen — the best of all circumstances.
After discussing your plan with advisers and successors, involve your key employees, who may be more satisfied knowing the company’s future.
What are some factors to consider with transferring ownership?
Once the management transition plan is established, plans for transferring ownership can occur. Usually this begins with your retirement plans. How much income will be needed and what’s the timeline? If you need cash from the business, are you willing to bear the ‘investment risk’ of the business as a source of income once you’re not involved?
Then, consider estate-planning issues. Are all your children involved in the business? If not, do you desire to ensure each child will ultimately receive an equal estate share?
How do tax consequences factor in?
Taxes are the tertiary consideration once decisions have been made regarding the general retirement and estate plans. As is the case with investment portfolios, taxes should never drive the decision-making process. Tax-reduction strategies should only be considered after other issues are decided.
Business owners in general, and particularly family-business owners, should begin now and get an experienced, independent adviser to guide them through the process. The earlier you plan, the better the results. Sound, experienced advice will make the process that much easier, and maybe even bring family members closer. λ
Julianne Cruz is managing director of Advisory Services at CB&T Wealth Management. Reach her at (310) 258-9301 or email@example.com.
Insights Banking & Finance is brought to you by California Bank & Trust
Wealth management services are offered through Contango Capital Advisors, Inc. (Contango), which operates as CB&T Wealth Management in California. Contango is a registered investment adviser, a nonbank affiliate of California Bank & Trust and a nonbank subsidiary of Zions Bancorporation. Some representatives of CB&T Wealth Management are also registered representatives of Zions Direct, which is a member of FINRA/SIPC and a nonbank subsidiary of Zions Bank. Employees of Contango are shared employees of Western National Trust Company (WNTC), a subsidiary of Zions Bank and an affiliate of Contango. #CCA0813-0090
Say the word “innovation,” and immediately you think about business legends like Steve Jobs and Jeff Bezos, as well as the companies they created – Apple and Amazon. Too often, however, we focus on the people who have been tabbed as innovators and the companies that develop those breakthrough products, services and solutions, such as Apple’s iPod and iTunes, or Amazon’s marketplace and unique ecosystem.
True innovation goes much deeper than a single leader’s vision. It is an all-encompassing philosophy that permeates an organization and defines its purpose for being. For me, at least, I prefer to think about innovation in its broadest terms, extending its definition to include corporate cultures and innovative management styles. Think about how Facebook and Microsoft are run, and how at both organizations employees are a key factor in the idea creation, or ideation, process.
Now, think about the breakthrough products that eventually went bust. Hopefully, you don’t have a basement full of Beanie Babies, boxes of Silly Bandz, or a home library filled with laser discs. It is more common to land on a singular breakthrough product that temporarily revolutionizes your industry rather than develop a product through a process that’s repeatable or scalable. And, just as true, no matter how innovative and creative your management team’s style may be, without the proper processes in place to push ideas through a system that takes them from mind to market, you’ll eventually have trouble keeping the lights on.
It all comes down to developing a culture imbued with innovation at its core. But this also requires having a servant culture in place where every person who works for the organization thinks about the customer first.
Consider San Francisco-based Kimpton Hotels, where employees strive to create “Kimpton Moments” by going above and beyond with guests and delivering memorable experiences.
Kimpton overcomes the inherent limitations for creating new innovative products that being a boutique hotel chain includes by approaching innovation through its employee interaction – and then rewarding employees for their creativity. For example, when team members put in the extra hours to ensure world-class service delivery, the hotel chain has sent flowers and gift baskets to their loved ones. And when they create an innovative service experience, the company rewards staff members with such things as spa days, extra paid time off and other goodies.
And then there’s the Boston Consulting Group, a management consulting firm that’s known for developing innovative business processes and systems for its high-end clientele. Part of BCG’s internal process is a focus on team members maintaining a healthy work-life balance. When individuals are caught working too many long weeks, the company’s management team issues a “red zone report” to flag the overwork.
Talk about innovation! And no product, service or solution was developed, marketed or sold.
And finally, few organizations are more innovative than DreamWorks Animation. But beyond plugging out groundbreaking animated movies, the studio’s culture embraces empowerment and innovation. Employees are given stipends to personalize their workstations so that they create whatever inspirational atmosphere they need to succeed. And, as the story goes, after completing Madagascar 3, the crew presented a Banana Splats party, where artists showed the outtakes.
Not only are these three companies known for being innovative in their respective industry spaces, they also share the honor of being members of Fortune’s 2013 “Great Places to Work” list.
So how do you take the first steps toward transformation or put those initial building blocks in place to begin the journey? There’s no magic formula, but there are some common traits – and they revolve around empowerment and establishing a culture that cares.
- Are open-minded and ask “What if?”
- Teach team members how to see what is not there and identify opportunities in the marketplace to take advantage of those gaps.
- Develop cultures where innovation thrives through open and honest communication.
- Flatten the organizational structure and recognize that innovation can come from anyone and anywhere.
- Make innovation, itself, a cyclical and continuous process.
Stop and take an internal assessment of your organization, your team and of yourself. If you can’t check a box next to each of these five traits, stop and ask yourself why. Then begin your own journey to greatness.
Sir Tim Berners-Lee recalls a time when computer users around the world were quite nervous about the power of Netscape.
“A lot of people thought, ‘Oh, wow, a clingy and controlling Web company. What do we do about it?’” says Berners-Lee, director of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and inventor of the World Wide Web. “Then they weren’t worried about Netscape anymore. They were worried about Microsoft, and they worried about Microsoft for a long time. Then they woke up one day and said, ‘Wait, the browser is not the issue. It’s the search engines.’”
Today, it’s the social network that has people worried, says Berners-Lee. But whichever medium is in society’s crosshairs, he says the fear is very similar in each case.
“When you have a monopoly, it slows innovation,” Berners-Lee says. “It reduces competition, and it’s generally not good for the market. One of the most important things about the Web is it being an open platform. The ’Net is a neutral medium. I can connect and you can connect, and we can talk. That is really important to an open market and democracy.”
One of Berners-Lee’s primary missions with the W3C is to ensure the Web is being used to its full potential. But it is also to make sure it remains an independent entity so that everyone who wants to has the opportunity to tap into that potential.
“If you can start tweaking what people say or you can start intercepting their communications, it’s very powerful,” Berners-Lee says. “It’s the sort of power that if you give it to a corrupt government, you can give them the ability to stay in power forever. It’s healthy for us to not put the Internet directly under the control of the government, but to have a set of multi-secular organizations at arm’s length from government acting responsibly and taking many views.”
Still plenty of room to grow
Berners-Lee helped launch the World Wide Web Foundation in 2009 to bring the power of the Web to more people.
“Maybe now 25 or 30 percent of the world uses the Web,” Berners-Lee says. “That’s still a massive gap and a massive number of languages where there still isn’t a lot on the Web. There’s a lot of culture that isn’t represented and a lot of countries where they haven’t the backbone for a good Internet base.”
The foundation has designed and produced the Web Index, the world’s first multi-dimensional measure of the world’s growth, utility and impact on people and nations. It covers 61 developed and developing countries, incorporating indicators that assess the political, economic and social impact of the Web in that country.
“The higher level of the Web Index is looking at impact,” Berners-Lee says. “Is it really affecting the way people do politics? Is it really affecting the way you do education? Is it affecting health?”
The recent turmoil in Egypt was a wake-up call to many who are connected to the Internet, but have started to take its power for granted.
“They thought the Internet was like the air, that it would always be there,” Berners-Lee says. “And people started asking the question, ‘Who could turn off my Internet?’”
Fortunately, there are countless efforts underway from those in the technology industry not to restrict access, but to take the Web to even greater heights.
“The art is designing it to work with all kinds of devices because different customer segments are going to use different devices in different countries,” Berners-Lee says. “If you’re designing something new on the Web, you need to make sure it works on all devices.”
How to reach: World Wide Web Consortium, www.w3.org
The greatest challenge of opportunity is said to be the ability to take the next step and understand what it will take to maximize that opportunity and achieve growth. Amy Rosen knows the importance of that comprehension.
“The skill set of an entrepreneur involves understanding how to create a business,” says Rosen, president and CEO for the Network for Teaching Entrepreneurship (NFTE).
Andres Cardona, who grew up in a rough neighborhood in Miami, is one of the best examples of this entrepreneurial spirit.
“He was on the verge of dropping out of school because his mom had lost her job, and he had to help contribute to the household,” Rosen says.
Fortunately, Cardona had become involved with NFTE. His natural leadership skills, along with the knowledge he was gaining from NFTE, empowered him to do something that would not only help his family, but also other youngsters in Miami.
Cardona founded the Elite Basketball Academy, an organization that would help kids hone both their basketball and leadership skills. He began with one kid and was making 70 cents an hour. Now, he’s a CEO with more than 150 kids, a staff of employees and he’s making money. He’s enrolled at Florida International University studying finance while he runs his business and supports his mom.
“I’m sure it will be the first of many businesses he runs,” Rosen says. “This is just a kid who needed to have his eyes opened to opportunity and learn some basics about business.”
A great place to start
The mission of NFTE is to work with young people from low-income communities, such as Cardona, and engage them in a different vision of opportunity and success.
“It’s basically an entrepreneurship class where they actually go through the whole business-creation process,” Rosen says. “At the end, which really gets to our mission, we want kids to actually connect school with opportunity so they stay in school. Kids start learning how to multiply fractions because they are figuring out their personal return on investments in their new company. We want them to start much earlier thinking about their future.”
Rosen points to Cardona as an example of a youngster with a great gift. But in too many cases, with too many young people, those gifts go unrealized and the child becomes an adult with nowhere to go.
“We want them to have a vision of success and whether they become entrepreneurs and create their own businesses or bring to their jobs and their employers an entrepreneurial mindset. That’s going to give them a much better chance at success,” Rosen says.
The work being done by NFTE fits like a glove with EY’s mission to drive entrepreneurialism in the business sector.
“Our cultures are so aligned around entrepreneurialism in general and we are all running competitions and promoting the notion that we need more entrepreneurs to solve problems,” Rosen says. “Now we have partners on every single one of our boards worldwide. They don’t have to be asked to do it. They really like doing it.”
Cardona was featured at the recent EY World Entrepreneur of the Year Award program in Monte Carlo. Other budding young leaders who have risen through NFTE also have been honored by EY.
“In every city where we have an operation, they feature our winning entrepreneurs,” Rosen says. “So the kids get an opportunity to network and see what success looks like and to go to the kinds of places they’ve never been and participate that way. And they get a sense of recognition for their work.”
Rosen says there’s nothing better than working with young people to prepare them for what lies ahead.
“If you’re going to give back, why not work with kids who need it the most and actually teach them and help them to be entrepreneurs,” Rosen says. “That’s what is going to grow our economy and create stability.”
How to reach: Network for Teaching Entrepreneurship, (212) 232-3333 or www.nfte.com
Although manufacturers can expect modest 2 percent growth through the remainder of 2013, the brief lull gives opportunistic executives a chance to prepare for an uptick in business next year.
Gus Faucher, senior economist for The PNC Financial Services Group, attributes his optimistic forecast to a rise in business investments, fueled by the resolution of murky tax and sequestration issues, and the continuation of record-low interest rates.
“I think the U.S. will maintain an edge in high value-add manufacturing because we have highly skilled, productive labor,” Faucher says. “Maintaining our competitive advantage requires ongoing development of our manufacturing workforce.”
As the economic recovery proceeds, in what areas will spending accelerate most? Manufacturers of home building products and materials, furnishings, appliances and so forth should have a strong 2014, thanks to the rebound in the residential real estate market. In turn, those manufacturers will purchase more production equipment, raw materials, parts and other items. The wealth effect in real estate will stimulate growth throughout the supply chain.
Will rising global demand for U.S. made products including semiconductors, medical devices and specialized materials manufacturing propel employment gains over the next few years? Post-recession hiring will wane next year as manufacturers look for productivity gains from workers added since employment levels bottomed out in early 2010. Although manufacturing is back up to 12 million workers, that’s still well below the 2006 peak of 14.2 million. The mantra continues to be: Do more with less.
How could the expansion of the shale oil industry affect manufacturing? Shale oil exploration and extraction will be a boon to ancillary industries and all U.S. manufacturers that rely on natural gas for production, since it will lower energy costs over the long-term. Moreover, it will give America a much-needed competitive advantage in today’s spirited global marketplace.
Augustine (Gus) Faucher is a senior economist for The PNC Financial Services Group. He is responsible for contributing to the preparation of PNC’s U.S. economic forecast and alternative economic scenarios.
The Rainforest: The Secret to Building the Next Silicon Valley
Victor W. Hwang and Greg Horowitt
Regenwald, 304 pages
What makes places like Silicon Valley tick? Can we replicate that magic in other places? How do you foster innovation in your own networks? Victor W. Hwang and Greg Horowitt propose a radical new theory to explain the nature of innovation ecosystems: human networks that generate extraordinary creativity and output. They argue that free market thinking fails to consider the impact of human nature on the innovation process.
These ecosystems, or Rainforests, can only thrive when certain cultural behaviors unlock human potential. The authors provide practical tools for readers to design, build and sustain new innovation ecosystems. The Rainforest challenges the basic assumptions that economists have held for over a century and will transform the way you think about technology, business and leadership.
The Coming Jobs War
Gallup Press, 220 pages
Drawing on 75 years of Gallup studies and his own perspective as the company’s chairman and CEO, Jim Clifton explains why jobs are the new global currency for leaders. To win, leaders need to compete. The business community needs to double the psychological engagement of workers so that it can compete with cheaper labor. Perhaps most importantly, leaders need to recognize universities, mentors and especially cities as a supercollider for job creation. There’s not a moment to waste: the war has already begun.
Innovation Nation: How America Is Losing Its Innovation Edge, Why It Matters, and What We Can Do to Get It Back
Free Press, 320 pages
John Kao first offers a stunning, troubling portrait of the recent erosion of U.S. competitiveness in innovation, then he takes readers on a fascinating tour of the leading innovation centers, such as those in Singapore, Denmark and Finland, which are trumping us in their more focused and creative approaches to fueling innovation. He then lays out a groundbreaking plan for a national innovation strategy that would empower the U.S. to marshal its vast resources of talent and infrastructure in ways that will produce transformative results.
While government regulations and prices for energy and raw materials influence manufacturing competitiveness, having a talented, innovative workforce was deemed the most critical factor in a country’s ability to compete in manufacturing, according to the 2013 Global Manufacturing Competitiveness Index by Deloitte.
Unfortunately, the U.S. is lagging behind other high-wage nations such as Germany and Japan when it comes to innovation in its manufacturing sector. And we’ll continue to lose ground if executives wait for colleges to churn out science, technology, engineering and mathematics graduates.
“We can’t wait for someone else to fix it. The talent issue needs to be addressed today,” says Jennifer McNelly, president of The Manufacturing Institute, a non-profit affiliate of the National Association of Manufacturers.
Experts may not agree about the existence of the so-called skills gap, but they unilaterally concur that manufacturing executives can jump-start innovation without breaking the bank by tapping into widely available brain trusts.
Collaboration is the secret sauce of innovation, John Zegers says. The director of the Georgia Center of Innovation for Manufacturing, Georgia Department of Economic Development, says creativity doesn’t evolve from one person — it comes from inviting different perspectives.
“Whether you’re trying to solve a problem on the manufacturing floor or develop a new product, it’s critically important to garner feedback from everyone who touches the product,” he says.
Historically, manufacturers have expected engineers to be their innovative spark plugs, but the notion of the lone innovator is fading amid the shortage of engineering talent. Today, 90 percent of managers view the manufacturing workforce as full partners in solving problems, improving processes and satisfying customers, according to the 2012 Manpower Manufacturing Workforce Survey.
Moreover, cross-functional teams comprised of accountants to shipping clerks are using their detail orientation and intimate knowledge of supply chain processes to streamline procedures and create new efficiencies.
“Involvement creates ownership and ownership inspires creativity since employees feel empowered to make changes,” Zegers says. “Plus, the cost of marshaling existing resources toward a problem is negligible.”
At the same time, garnering input from people in dissimilar roles broadens a team’s perspective and buoys critical thinking by injecting a dose of cultural and ethnic diversity. Of 321 companies surveyed by Forbes, 85 percent agreed or strongly agreed that diversity is key to driving innovation in the workplace.
While many organizations want the benefits of high-stakes innovation, their culture won’t support it. Executives who resist outside-the-box ideas or penalize failure may unconsciously stifle creativity. If you champion the efforts of cross-functional teams by removing the barriers to innovation and sponsoring a culture that shuns the status quo and rewards risk-taking, the seeds of creativity will sprout and bloom, but only under the right conditions.
Close skill gaps through training and education
Manufacturing executives frequently bemoan the dearth of workers capable of mastering today’s increasingly hi-tech, team-based roles, yet the answer to the problem could be right under their noses.
About 20 percent of all American jobs are now in the STEM fields, with half of those open to workers who don’t have a four-year college degree, according to a new analysis by the Brookings Institution, who refers to these workers as the second STEM economy. Second STEM workers come from high schools, community colleges and vocational schools and are critical to the implementation of new ideas since they advise researchers on feasibility of design options, cost estimates and other practical aspects of technological development.
Manufacturers bear some responsibility for their predicament according to Manpower, since most companies are not recruiting for manufacturing talent as if they were knowledge workers and are not managing them as a knowledge workforce either.
Specifically, they’re neither developing their current employees nor building a pipeline of technically proficient talent to meet near-term hiring needs.
“There are plenty of 40-year-olds working in the industry who were trained in a different way,” says Rick Jarman, president and CEO of The National Center for Manufacturing Sciences. “The talent is there, they just need retraining and development.”
Investing in daylong seminars that use simulation to teach lean manufacturing concepts, kaizen events, overall equipment effectiveness, value stream mapping and so forth can yield big dividends, Jarman says. Workers who understand modern manufacturing concepts may enhance a company’s penchant for innovation.
Plus, ingenuity is a teachable skill. Employees can learn the fundamentals of the innovation process and start generating money-saving, useful ideas after attending a short, four-hour training course. Plus, upgrading your current staff is less risky and time-consuming than developing novices.
Since manufacturing will see a 50 percent increase in the number of mature workers over the next decade, companies should consider this workforce segment as they assess their near-to-medium-term talent acquisition strategies. Innovative organizations are pairing mature workers with technically savvy new hires to facilitate knowledge transfer and mentoring.
Indeed, some industry veterans have the ability and desire to learn advanced technical skills like computer numerical control, machine tools, computer-aided design and manufacturing programs or even robotics, if given the chance. High-potentials are being offered tuition assistance because having a technically competent workforce is critical to innovation.
“Manufacturers can’t capitalize on groundbreaking technology or invest in computer-aided machinery if they don’t have someone to operate it,” McNelly says. “This is just one example of how the skills gap can impact innovation throughout an entire industry.”
Employers can close debilitating talent shortages in as little as three to six months by raising their expectations and requesting certified workers from local community colleges. McNelly cites a pilot program in Northeast Ohio as an example of successful educational alliance. Community colleges provide NAM-Endorsed certified training to students to prepare them for advanced manufacturing careers.
“Just showing up is no longer enough,” McNelly says. “Employers need certified employees to thrive in a manufacturing environment that’s grounded in teamwork.”
Enticing high school students is a long-term solution to looming talent shortages in manufacturing. To succeed, executives need to change students’ perception of the industry.
Offer them apprenticeships and invite students to tour plants so they can see that there’s more to a manufacturing career than standing on your feet all day, says McNelly.
“Show them a distinct career path and the technical aspects of the job, or else bright students with a flair for innovation will pursue opportunities in other industries,” she says.
Cross boundaries to expand your brain trust
Augmenting the creative efforts of a modest staff by crowdsourcing ideas and suggestions from customers and stakeholders is a new approach gaining attention. According to Newsweek, Unilever established an open innovation unit to work with outside partners in 2009, which increased the share of external ideas that are adopted by the company’s business units from 25 percent to 60 percent. Even Starbucks is asking stakeholders to help develop ideas to reduce waste.
While it’s possible to solicit ideas via social media and traditional focus groups, many companies are using online discussion boards to engage outsiders in stimulating conversations with executives and engineers. The back-and-forth banter encourages participation and helps flesh-out creative ideas in real time.
If a shortage of engineering expertise and technical know-how is stifling R&D, one technique is to borrow the requisite expertise by tapping the brain trust at your local college or university.
“Many colleges and universities will gladly provide research, access to labs, professors and engineering students to local manufacturers,” Zegers says. “They can help you develop cutting edge technology or solve problems without adding to staff. They can even help defray development costs by connecting manufacturers with grants or matching funds from state and local governments.”
Collaborative R&D is another way to leverage external expertise and technology in the quest to develop cutting edge products and efficient manufacturing processes.
“Manufacturers can reach the end game faster by pooling intellectual capital and sharing the investment and the return with partners who have complementary talents,” Jarman says.
If you don’t have the wherewithal to source partners and manage large-scale projects, you can still enjoy the benefits of collaborative R&D, by engaging an intermediary.
The National Center for Manufacturing Sciences provides neutral, third-party collaborative project oversight. Or, seek out industry programs that form strong multi-disciplinary teams by matching willing partners with experts from universities, government labs and external funding sources. Collaborating with engineers from the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Manufacturing Extension Partnership or other public/private partnerships is yet another option.
The opportunities to innovate are endless, even for small manufacturers, if executives go out of their way to broaden their talent circles.
“There are more than 300,000 manufacturers in the U.S. and endless opportunities to collaborate,” Jarman says. “Some of the most creative ideas are coming from small and mid-size manufacturers who have crossed boundaries and barriers to pursue talent-driven innovation.”
How to reach: National Association of Manufacturers, www.nam.org; The National Center for Manufacturing Sciences, www.ncms.org; The Georgia Center of Innovation for Manufacturing, manufacturing.georgiainnovation.org
Back in 2005, Hamdi Ulukaya stumbled upon a classified ad for a yogurt plant recently closed down by Kraft. After initially ignoring the ad, Ulukaya had a gut feeling that he should at least visit the plant.
It’s a good thing he listened to his gut. Otherwise the story of his company, Chobani Inc., may be very different today. After seeing the plant Kraft had for sale, Ulukaya bought it on the spot and went to work perfecting the recipe for Chobani Greek yogurt based on his belief that everyone, regardless of income or location, deserved access to delicious, high-quality yogurt.
“I grew up with yogurt,” says Ulukaya, who is founder and CEO of the New Berlin, N.Y.-based company. “Being from Turkey, a big part of our diet was yogurt.”
It wasn’t just a gut feeling that made Ulukaya visit the plant, but it was also a gut feeling that Chobani would make it in the world of yogurt in retail.
“I didn’t analyze it too much,” he says. “It was nothing but a gut feeling. Everyone I knew that had a knowledge of business were looking at the category and at who was closing a plant, which was Kraft. Everyone who looked at the idea was against it.
“I would be convinced for a day by the people I talked to and then the next day I’d change my mind. The only thing I knew was there was a big opportunity in yogurt.”
Here’s how Ulukaya built a yogurt empire that has gone head-to-head with category veterans Dannon and Yoplait.
Keep the faith
Chobani began with the hiring of five employees. However, the initial employees, including Ulukaya himself, lacked the experience in launching a yogurt company.
“I built the company based on people, not with experience from before, but willing to learn and try anything,” he says. “We had a bunch of people that had never done this before. None of us had run companies. None of us had worked in high levels of companies. None of us were from Fortune 500s.
“Whatever you look for in people to bring them into a company — none of us had it. Most of the people came in from an entry-level position and now they’re leading departments. Chobani not only became a business that grew, but Chobani was like a school to us, including myself.”
With that mentality Chobani’s first yogurt hit shelves 18 months after Ulukaya bought the Kraft plant, and has since grown to become America’s No. 1 yogurt.
“It was not easy, but what we found out was what is seen and what is reality are two different things,” Ulukaya says. “The category was owned by two major companies. Dannon and Yopliat owned about 70 percent of the market, and they had been there for years. As a startup, you go to the specialty stores first. That’s how you start and you grow and once you reach a certain level then you go to the big retailers.”
Ulukaya didn’t want to do that. He wanted to go to the big retailers first and be in the regular dairy isle.
“That was a crazy idea and nobody thought that would go, but at least we tried,” he says.
“When we tried, we convinced one retailer in New York, ShopRite. The result from that was we were able to expand to a couple of other retailers. After the second or third customer that we had success with for our yogurt I knew it wasn’t going to be about selling — it was about making enough. So from that moment on I lived in the plant.”
Chobani has grown from five employees to almost 2,000 today. The company started out with one truckload of milk a day and now uses more than 4 million pounds daily. Its products are now available nationwide as well as in Australia, the UK and Canada.
Build a culture that breeds passion
Chobani’s success has been driven by Ulukaya’s passion, which earned him the title of EY Entrepreneur Of The Year 2012 U.S., and subsequently, the 2013 World Entrepreneur Of The Year. That success has also been a result of Chobani’s culture of delivering the highest quality.
“We have a reason for doing what we are doing,” Ulukaya says. “We want to make an awesome product for everybody. We want to make it nutritious, delicious and accessible. While we are making it, we want to build things around it. We want to be a part of the community. We want to be places where we can make a difference. That gives people reasons to get together and do something awesome.”
As Chobani has expanded and its core team has grown-up, it’s been important to transfer that culture and belief to everyone else.
“That passion was so strong, and I think we are so connected to our business. I am personally so involved in the business, especially in the plants, that having those one-on-one conversations and being an example, not just preaching and putting things on the wall, but by living it and putting in hard work, affects us more,” he says. “We built Chobani on those qualities.”
Chobani has gone from nothing to $1 billion in five years. That kind of growth can be stressful, but Ulukaya enjoys what he does and that’s what pushes him forward.
“It has its highs and lows, because let’s face it, it’s not easy,” he says. “They asked Steve Jobs what was the most important thing in business and he said, ‘Passion.’ If you don’t have passion you would give up when things get difficult. We have so much passion and love for what we do that it becomes a part of our life. I personally don’t separate my personal life from my business, because I’m doing something that I love.”
Ulukaya calls that passion “The Chobani Way.” He doesn’t expect any of his employees to have to pretend they enjoy what they’re doing or act differently than who they are.
“I have never become different depending on whether I was involved in business or in my personal life,” he says. “You don’t have to pretend to smile. You come as you are and you just try to learn it. That became ‘The Chobani Way.’”
How to reach: Chobani Inc., (877) 847-6181 or www.chobani.com